Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01615
Original file (PD2012 01615.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201615
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130402
SEPARATION DATE: 20020930


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (31U/Signal Support Systems Specialist) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). This soldier first complained of back pain in early 2000 and he was treated conservatively. Imaging showed spondylosis of L5 and 1st degree spondylolisthesis of L5-S 1, and minimal arthritic changes at L3, L4, and L5 joints. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). His back conditions, characterized as “Chronic low back pain due to Grade I spondylolisthesis of L5 on S 1,” Degenerative disc disease at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S 1,” and “Posterior osteophytic ridging with disc bulges present at L3-4 and L4-5,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The other conditions were not discussed . The CI initially indicated non-concurrence but then concurred. He made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: The application states simply, “Army rated at only 10% - My VA rating totaled 30% for my back/sciatic condition. All of my VA pay was withheld as it was grouped as 1 injury.” [sic] The CI does not elaborate further or specify a request for Board consideration of any additional conditions.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Service rating for the unfitting low back pain condition is addressed below. The Grade I spondylolisthesis, DDD and posterior osteophytic ridging with disc bulges were findings which were part and parcel of the LBP condition and are accordingly addressed within the LBP section. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20020725
 VA – 2 Wks. Pre/Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low back pain
 5299-5295 10% Low Back Pain with Spondylolisthesis of L5 on Sl, Degenerative Disc Disease at LJ-4, L4-5 And L5-Sl and Posterior Osteophyte Ridging with Disc Bulges at L3-4 and L4-5 5010 10% 20020912
Grade I Spondylolisthesis of L5 on S 1 (causing CLBP)
 No remark by PEB
Degenerative Disc Disease at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S 1
 No remark by PEB
Posterior Osteophytic Ridging with Disc Bulges Present at L3-4 and L4-5.
 No remark by PEB
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Sciatic Compression, Right Trochanteric Notch 8520 20% 20020912
No Additional VA Entries 20020912
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes that the CI had a history of LBP beginning in 2000, with radiation to the right leg at times. Pain continued despite ongoing treatment and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, DDD, and degenerative arthritis, with disc bulging that did not cause any nerve impingement or spinal stenosis. The CI was referred to a pain clinic but failed to improve with treatment. At the MEB exam 20 February 2002, approximately 7 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant LBP and recurrent hip pain with a limp. Running and doing marches aggravated the pain and caused radiation of the pain down the right lower extremity to his foot. The MEB physical exam noted decreased flexion and extension of the lumbar spine, described as “the patient was unable to touch his toes.” There was tenderness to palpation of the lumbar muscles. There was normal strength and reflexes, and “a complaint of decreased sensation in the lateral aspect of the right leg” was noted. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 12 September 2002, approximately 2 weeks prior to separation, the CI reported pain with sit-ups and other activity. The VA exam noted lumbar flexion was 90 degrees (normal 90 degrees), extension 10 degrees (normal 30 degrees), right and left lateral flexion of 25 degrees (normal 30 degrees), with pain at all end range-of-motion (ROM). Knee and ankle reflexes on the right were reported “2/3” and on the left “3/3.” There was no muscle atrophy or deformity of either extremity. The VA examiner also noted the CI’s history of right hip and leg pain and that palpation of the sciatic notch on the right reproduced the radiating pain to the back of the knee.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated LBP as 5299-5295 at 10% (lumbosacral strain with characteristic pain on motion). The VA rated LBP as 5010 (traumatic arthritis) at 10%. The VA also rated right sciatic compression as 8520 (incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve) at 20%. The Board must apply the VASRD rating criteria in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did so. There was no evidence in the record of incapacitating episodes as specified in the VASRD spine rating criteria in effect at the time of the CI’s separation. The Board agreed that the CI’s LBP condition met the 10% rating under 5295. The Board deliberated whether it met the next higher rating of 20%. The Board agreed that the CI’s chronic LBP met the 20% rating under 5295 as evidenced by documented recurrent episodes of LBP with muscle spasm. The Board next deliberated whether the CI’s right lower extremity pain indicated a separately ratable peripheral nerve disability. Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. Exams 6 to 12 months prior to separation indicated the CI had normal strength, sensation, and reflexes. An exam 5 months prior to separation indicated decreased sensation along the sciatic nerve distribution during an acute exacerbation with muscle spasms. The VA exam noted the sciatic pain, along with mildly decreased knee and ankle reflexes on the right compared with the left and did not mention sensory deficits. There is no evidence in the record of functional impairment due to either sensory decrease or muscle weakness of the right lower extremity. The LBP condition was intermittently associated with radiation of pain to the right leg; the right leg pain was not a separate condition from the LBP condition. Therefore, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition coded as 5299-5295.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5295 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain
 5299-5295 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120820, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB )


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130009106 (PD201201615)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 

                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01162

    Original file (PD 2013 01162.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “lumbar degenerative disc disease and spondylolysis with low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. CI CONTENTION : “ At the time of my evaluation it was determined that I had several problems with my lower back. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01790

    Original file (PD2012 01790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [The CI] suffers from back pain. Additionally, under the current general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine, which uses ROM measurements for rating, the CI’s back pain would also be rated at 10% based on the ROM measurements documented in the NARSUM. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board would not have supported a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment (as opposed to the PEB’s adjudication).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020

    Original file (PD-2012-01020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00609

    Original file (PD2012 00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FPEB adjudicated the previous conditions as it had before (chronic LBP and saphenous nerve palsy, left as unfitting, rating 20% and 0% respectively) and also adjudicated “Left knee pain due to retropatellar pain syndrome” as unfitting and rated at 0%. The VA coded the condition 8727 and rated 10%. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00717

    Original file (PD2011-00717.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain, Due To L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis …5299-529510%Chronic Low Back Pain529210%20021125Sciatica, Left Lower Extremity852020%20021125↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓Not Service Connected x 320030206 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%* * VA rating based on exam most proximate to date of permanent separation and includes Board of Veterans Appeals determination and later VA correction of effective date. The MEB forwarded condition was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00452

    Original file (PD-2014-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of my medical records will show this. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00744

    Original file (PD2012-00744.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW CASE NUMBER: PD1200744 BOARD DATE: 20130314 NAME: X BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20011115 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a U.S. Marine Corps active duty CPL/E-4(6531/Aviation Ordanceman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). RATING COMPARISON: PEB – Dated 20010921 Condition Chronic Low Back Pain Left Lateral Leg...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01090

    Original file (PD2013 01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. No evidence of spondylolysis or pars defect.”At the MEB medical examination...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761

    Original file (PD-2012-00761.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...